Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Human Adaptation to the Environment - Variation and Race

The concept of homeostasis is widely used, in physiology and psychology, to identify what seems to be a general attribute of living organisms: the tendency to maintain and restore certain steady states or conditions of the organism. An obvious example is that of body temperature, which in the human tends to fluctuate only in a narrow range about the value 98.6° F. When the temperature rises above the normal range, corrective reflexes (perspiration, reduced metabolism, etc.) go into action to restore the steady state. Persistent deviation may initiate other actions (moving into the shade, plunging into water, etc.). If body temperature drops, other corrective actions are observed.

 Critics have objected to homeostatic theory as being too conservative, as implying that motivation is conceived solely as operating to restore pre-existing conditions. In a very narrow sense this criticism is true: unless the essential steady states are restored to their normal range, the organism dies. (It is also true that most people are conservative unless deprived.) In a broader sense, homeostatic theory says that energy is mobilized to take action that will restore and protect these steady states, but that the action may be novel and inventive. Fire, clothing, and other inventions serve homeostatic uses. The individual, frustrated by inadequate habits, may acquire new ones which will reduce tension.

1.
The higher elevations weren’t the regional origin for hominid evolution, various factors in these zones upset homeostasis. Severely limited oxygen supply results in Hypoxia and affects body tissue maintenance, and red blood cell health. The brain, heart, and lungs, likewise suffer from delayed function in environment low in oxygen, the primary energy source being shorted. The sun’s ultraviolet solar radiation is more intense, the greater elevations are above the cloud layer, without protection from harmful rays and radiation. Low humidity, cold temperatures, and rough topography had severe adverse-effects on homeostasis, forcing the body into change, upsetting the metabolism. Hypoxia which affects all areas of the body was the most critical to human survival.


 2.
a. When it comes to short-term adaptation: One example of short term adaptation to an environment with high elevations is the development of acclimatization. This quickly developing adaption permits the body to be more efficient in a low-oxygen environment, maintaining homeostasis for as long as possible. After a few days of living within these forceful environments the body upsurges the metabolic rate, respiration, and heart rate. Non-essential bodily functions are suppressed providing the best chances for survival. 


b. When it comes to facultative adaptation: The increased hemoglobin-producing red blood cells are a facultative adaptation. The increase in these cells permits for more hemoglobin production and in-thus more oxygen transport between organs and tissues, as genes are being switched on or off to affect a phenotypic expression. 



c. A prime example of a developmental /genetic adaption at high elevations is the way gluclose is processed in the body. High-land Quechua utilize glucose in a process that allows for efficient oxygen use in their low-oxygen environment. Glucose is critical for survival, as it is the only energy the brain will utilize to maintain function. The changes in glucose efficiency are measured as genetic mutations in MtDNA. These mutations have become more obvious in these environments, presenting how important an adaption they truly are in the long-term.


 d. A prime example of a cultural adaptation in extraordinary elevation environments are adaptations developed by man, and are utilized to endure and thrive. An example would be breathing masks that climbers use to be able to carry out extreme bodily function in a low-oxygen environment like Mt. Kilimanjaro. These oxygen masks contain special bottles containing high pressure chemicals that provide a extended duration of constant supply of oxygen to the climber.


 3.  Adaptation is essential in order to survive and move ahead in the world. The ability to adapt to people, situations and surroundings affords people a greater opportunity to get what they want and what they need. Without the ability to adapt, people may find themselves stuck in situations far longer than is necessarily and unable to reach their goals. The study of human variation through a wide array of environmental clines accurately shows how adaptive the human nervous system is. Testing the limits of survival, and the way in which the body can adapt to such environments leads to added knowledge about the outer -rims of human potential. This includes mental capacity, baron survival, and athletics thus giving understanding into future evolution. This evidence is critical in determining how the body may respond to a outbreak of an infectious disease, or how a new drug may affect ones long-term health. These environments push the survival of humanity to greater limits, and portray the methodology in which adaptation occurs.

4. Using race to understand why or how the human nervous system adapts to a certain environmental cline is not only inconclusive, but also inefficient. Race is slightly more than related ancestors who possess like physical qualities, and/or country origin, giving very little information on the genetic, environmental, or cultural adaptations a person may have endured. It's not the skin color, or the genetic likenesses that members of a certain race possess, more so it's the makings and pressures that previous environmental cline might have imposed on the human. These adaptations become quite useless in an opposing cline, the body will be forced into further alteration to maintain homeostasis. It’s possible the genetic and physical similarities could be used to measure the slight differences in how certain races adapt to a punishing environment. The environment forces parallel adaption and change in each species regardless of racial background. Overall eventually, when placed in a cruel and unforgiving environment, all people, regardless of race will adapt in like ways (just at different rates that will in time will more-less even out).


“I am what time, circumstances, history, have made of me, certainly, but I am also much more than that. So are we all”. – James Baldwin

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Week 7 Language Experiment

 Week 7 Language Experiment
Part 1: Engage in a conversation for 15 minutes where you were not allowed to use any version of a symbolic language (no speaking, writing, or ASL).

In this Language experiment the objective was to converse with someone in a setting where speaking, writing and sign language were not allowed. I knew this assignment was going to be very difficult, as I know for a fact that I myself communicate and present myself much more fluently on paper and/or in writing than verbally. Our society revolves around effective communication, and even though it is obviously such a natural thing for our society to speak and write to one another, I myself put a strain on speech mannerism when I know there are issues, personal feelings, or in this case parameters involved, but when you take speech and writing away, my conversations become a little more strenuous and much slower. Communicating with gestures was a meticulously slow and somewhat frustrating experience for me, since getting a point across or trying to ask a question is near impossible to do alone.

I quickly found that I was not in control (as I usually am with my female significant other) in this experiment and I was not able to direct the conversation in any way.  My partner changed the topic, asking nearly all of the questions and played the guesstimating game when I attempted to answer them, thus I felt incapable in the fact that I wanted to communicate but could not and just had to go along with the direction of my significant other in an almost endless cycle until they attempted to change the topic in question.

In a conversation representing two different cultures; one that uses spoken language, and the other that doesn’t use spoken language, I agree that the culture that was able to converse fluently and directly would have the advantage, whereas the culture that couldn’t converse directly would not be able to relate ideas at all. At the same time, I also feel that the culture that did not use the spoken language would sense a deeper association with those that they communicate to. Since those that don't speak must devote added effort into expressing their emotions and ideas they would perhaps be more easily invested in a discussion with another that was required to do the same thing. I do believe there are limitations on this though, depending on the closeness to a certain person in a certain situation (i.e.) work, and the type of working environment, the task at hand, and the liabilities involved in the work responsibilities /function.

Part 2: Spend 15 minutes communicating without any physical embellishments, i.e., no hand signals, not vocal intonation, not head, facial, or body movements.

I would say that this part of the assignment was almost, and/or practically as a challenging as the first. I was permitted to speak this time around and use language, but this did not come without its own demise. At one point, I also was told to stop moving my head. I also raised my eyebrows (as these are regular movements during regular communication and during sex, for me).  My partner even caught me attempting to use hand movements. My partner seemed minimally interested in the conversation, which I thought was interesting; because I was speaking in a drone-type voice she seemed less interested  as we were talking, which is what I was actually supposed to be feeling.

These experiments made me see how verbal communication is just a percentage of what we depend on to talk. Hand movements and facial expressions help us with our expressions.  Fluctuating the normal movements and/or expressions has a bearing effect on the overall communication.  I’ve noticed that authoritative speakers change vocal tones and the pace of their speech to communicate important aspects of their point. I am a firm believer that eye and hand movement definitely relay messages and/or can be used in conjunction with verbal language to communicate more effective.

I believe reading body language can help a person survive, obtain resources, and reproduce successfully in the following ways. In regards to, the adaptive benefit to possessing the ability to read body language. Deprived of the ability to read body language, a person would probably have a difficult time communicating with just about anyone; a single wrong interpretation of a person’s speech due to differing cultural backgrounds could possibly cause them to have a wrong view of that persons point, (i.e.) treating  the individual as combative vs. opinionated. This lack of communicative skill would make it difficult to flourish in a society that is based off social interactions on a daily basis, one can't just go through life without speaking to another person, however as I said, people can become offended quite easily, leaving it that much more challenging for a person like this to form long-term relationships.

Most can easily pick out a person who can't read body language that well, most people express their emotions through their tone of voice or hand motions, and it is not difficult to decipher a person's emotions. For example, someone who uses sarcasm quite a bit and makes it obvious enough at times that they weren’t being serious. This would make the need to watch what is said around them. Or sometimes people don't know how to interpret, or don't pick up on body language and that can be a beneficial thing. A person may under react or overreact about something quite often and that could be beneficial.